🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are developing steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also designing protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also delivers a clear message that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."