🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where African descendants are compensated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase Black history and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how little it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.